you can quote other people who don't know what's going on but as soon as they don't have an answer, neither do you. still waiting on the answers to 2 questions i have asked.
you can quote other people who don't know what's going on but as soon as they don't have an answer, neither do you. still waiting on the answers to 2 questions i have asked.
so what you're saying is that you concede your point? unless that is the case, just have your next post answer those two simple questions. i can even repost them here for you.
1 2 3 4 5, _____, 7 8
which number goes in the blank?
and the other question was: why is it that ice cubes are hotter than the sun (and this one isn't a riddle or basic counting problem; it's a serious question regarding the temperature of the two objects)?
as it stands, you have been avoiding even trying to answer either question including your most recent post where you straight up say that you refuse to look at any evidence that proves your point moot.
I'm not going to answer those questions. I asked you before to explain the fault reasoning on the video about Saturn. If you don't want to then thats fine but until you do, you can't claim that the video is false if you can't back it up with an explanation otherwise you're simply being credulous.
i have already explained it to you. many times, in fact. i then asked you two questions. instead of answering them, you posted a new video. that was debunked and you posted a new video instead of answering my questions. there are 2 simple questions still needing to be answered by you and it will all be clear.
if you want another elaborate answer, enough have been given to you to go back and pick one to fill in this blank you seem to have. ad hominem, ad boculum (unfortunately), ad ignorantum (repetitively), post hoc (also repetitively), and strawman are just naming a few. there, it's explained. i'll choose ad ignorantum to delve into briefly. when making a claim the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim, not those defending it. speculation does not count as evidence (hence my first question). even if it did, a small amount like that still wouldn't shift the burden of proof (hence my second question).
You didn't explain how Saturn worship is not in all religions. You didn't explain how the hexagram, pentagram, & the all seeing eye is not Saturn symbolism. You didn't explain how NASA's pictures of the hexagon, pentagram & eye shape features on the planet are false. You didn't explain how hexagons, pentagrams & all seeing eye symbolism is not used in all these religions. You didn't go over the video at all to explain any of what was presented. Your only statement was "bullshit"
The video gave archaeological evidence of these religions using the very same symbols found on the planet. I don't know what else more evidence you need to understand that all those symbols come from that planet. It makes no sense to agree with a person like you who is ignorant in everyway, who not only can't prove his claim but refuses to explain it. Your intellect is well overrated at this point.