wow.
i didnt know my story could make a problem between some loosers.
if u dont like my story, just ignore it and go to hell. ur not supposed to read evrything in this board
Printable View
wow.
i didnt know my story could make a problem between some loosers.
if u dont like my story, just ignore it and go to hell. ur not supposed to read evrything in this board
while were pointing out grammar errors, you forgot a comma between "proud of" and "considering". :rolleyes but thanks for the english lecture. and to be honest, you seem to know a little too much of a stranger on a fart fetish forum that you just happen to also be registered to. and just because something isnt proven, that doesnt mean that it cant possibly be true. look at O. J. Simpson for example, or Michael Jackson. haha "gimme some of that jesus juice!" ::rollQuote:
Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
"save it jr. elsewhere youre defending a male masquerading as a girl and youre too fucking brainless to see that queer for what he is. fail."
i know you fail at grammar/spelling/life/responding logically, but YOU don't have to point it out that blatantly; you do it well enough in your posts. if you can tell me where i'm defending a male masquerading as a girl then i will step down (more than likely a quote will be necessary), but since i am 100% sure that you can't do that, i'll just let your lack of apostrophes prove that you are the bitch of the english language. way to do my work for me, bitch (of the english language which you seem proud of considering the effort you must put into it in order for you be that much of a bitch).
dude, unless you are an english professor, your credentials don't mean shit. wow, you're a postgrad who can't use an apostrophe. you're doing a masters with no apostrophes. commenting in a fart fetish forum doesn't compare to writing a thesis on fucking without apostrophes. you "dont" give a fuck what i think WITHOUT APOSTROPHES. hey, i'm just trying to better you as a person, but if you want to be an intolerant dick and argue about something that you have no evidence to prove anything you say then that's your choice. seriously, you say that you're a postgrad who's writing a thesis and you can't even do a tiny bit of research to prove you point. if you really are what you say you are (not a complete moron), then your next post will contain some indisputable proof that haley is a man. otherwise you will just prove that you're wrong about yet another thing (not being a complete moron).Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
jr...lil lesson...im a postgrad doing a masters theres nothing wrong with my grammar and spelling i just dont think that commenting in a FART FETISH FORUM compares to writing a fucking thesis so i dont give a fuck what you think...the fact nothing you have eva said in response to my criticisms has displayed an ounce of academic discourse is enough to demonstrate that youre an uneducated clown so youre wasting your time trying to flex your cleverness because it doesnt exist...go back to defending those "girls" like "haley" you fucking imbecile.
and, colbydenn, my, bad, for, missing, a, comma,. thank, you, for, pointing, it, out, for, me. trust, me it, won't, happen, again, (dammit). also, while the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of non-absence either. in fact, the only thing proven by a lack of evidence is that there's a lack of evidence.
Quote:
Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
dude, unless you are an english professor, your credentials don't mean shit. wow, you're a postgrad who can't use an apostrophe. you're doing a masters with no apostrophes. commenting in a fart fetish forum doesn't compare to writing a thesis on fucking without apostrophes. you "dont" give a fuck what i think WITHOUT APOSTROPHES. hey, i'm just trying to better you as a person, but if you want to be an intolerant dick and argue about something that you have no evidence to prove anything you say then that's your choice. seriously, you say that you're a postgrad who's writing a thesis and you can't even do a tiny bit of research to prove you point. if you really are what you say you are (not a complete moron), then your next post will contain some indisputable proof that haley is a man. otherwise you will just prove that you're wrong about yet another thing (not being a complete moron).Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
jr...lil lesson...im a postgrad doing a masters theres nothing wrong with my grammar and spelling i just dont think that commenting in a FART FETISH FORUM compares to writing a fucking thesis so i dont give a fuck what you think...the fact nothing you have eva said in response to my criticisms has displayed an ounce of academic discourse is enough to demonstrate that youre an uneducated clown so youre wasting your time trying to flex your cleverness because it doesnt exist...go back to defending those "girls" like "haley" you fucking imbecile.
and, colbydenn, my, bad, for, missing, a, comma,. thank, you, for, pointing, it, out, for, me. trust, me it, won't, happen, again, (dammit). also, while the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of non-absence either. in fact, the only thing proven by a lack of evidence is that there's a lack of evidence.
you completely missed the gist of my post. im on a FART FETISH FORUM. why the fuck am i going to go to the trouble to use the punctuation that i wouldnt bother to use when writing a sms or chatting or some other leisurely pursuit? im not writing a thesis here because here isnt uni. the whole gist of my post was that i write papers all the time so its not like i dont know how to punctuate when im communicating arguments to my lecturers and not a roomful of FART FETISH FORUM members. the whole fucking point is that critiquing someones english because of the way they write ONLINE in a fucking FART FETISH FORUM of all places is fucking immature and reeks of the sort of shit an adolescent boy would say. "you have no education cos u spell u u n well um its you u know". meanwhile said boy reveals the fact HE is the brainless loser for thinking the net can conceal someones gender indefinately when it CAN NOT. why the fuck do you think "haley" or any idiot that does that queer shit is magically protected from detection just because its online? well? well? it doesnt take a postgrad to see through this idiot. i know 1st year students studying gender who could see through this jerk in the blink of an eye. im sorry jr but you do this every time you try to undermine my intelligence. you came off looking like an imbecile because you failed to comprehend a single and simple fucking point about context. if you think omitting punctuation on a FART FETISH FORUM is indicative of someones education you need to grow the fuck up. its funny how you think you can read someones education from their casual writing style but you think someones gender remains a complete mystery until you practically see them in the flesh. if you know anything about the dynamics of onus of proof you will know that that is on him and not i. or sion. it will never happen. and deep down i think you know it. but idfc anymore. im here to enjoy the forum. im no longer arguing about this loser or anything else for that matter.
> it doesnt take a postgrad to see through this idiot. i know 1st year students studying gender who could see through this jerk in the blink of an eye.
Sigh. No, it doesn't. But nobody else here gives a shit whether Haley is a guy or girl. Nobody asked your opinion about it either, but you've decided to give it anyway, and call us all idiots in the process. I know, I know, how could we be so stupid, how could we be so stupid to think he's a girl, how stupid we are, his discourse is MALE, his discourse is MALE - we are stupid to not see this, how many times do you have to tell us morons that his discourse is MALE. You can't see why this is boring? Basically you come across as somebody who's read "An idiot's guide to discourse", thinks he's learned everything there is to know about the universe, wants to share his wisdom but can only remember the phrase "his discourse is male". In other words, you come across as ignorant and deliberately aggravating in equal measure. You come across as a troll, in fact.
> im on a FART FETISH FORUM.
You obviously think being a masters student is relevant to the position you're expressing on a fart fetish forum, or you wouldn't have brought it up. You think it justifies calling everybody morons and simpletons, but you're not the most qualified person here by a long shot, so all you've done is make yourself look ridiculous.
my my look what I have done
enough said. you just proved that "you're wrong about yet another thing (not being a complete moron)." now, i don't have to undermine your intelligence; you do that well enough on your own. i know for a fact that you don't have the highest iq here. i know for a fact that you don't have the highest degree here (i believe effing said he had that one, or at least one higher than you). i AM NOT questioning these things because i already know the answers to them (note that i sure as hell am not saying you have the lowest iq or lowest degree either, just that you're not #1). i told you that you can either provide evidence to support your claims in your next post or have it basically converted to "i'm a complete moron" and you chose the latter. good for you and i hope you're happy with your choice.Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
you completely missed the gist of my post. im on a FART FETISH FORUM. why the fuck am i going to go to the trouble to use the punctuation that i wouldnt bother to use when writing a sms or chatting or some other leisurely pursuit? im not writing a thesis here because here isnt uni. the whole gist of my post was that i write papers all the time so its not like i dont know how to punctuate when im communicating arguments to my lecturers and not a roomful of FART FETISH FORUM members. the whole fucking point is that critiquing someones english because of the way they write ONLINE in a fucking FART FETISH FORUM of all places is fucking immature and reeks of the sort of shit an adolescent boy would say. "you have no education cos u spell u u n well um its you u know". meanwhile said boy reveals the fact HE is the brainless loser for thinking the net can conceal someones gender indefinately when it CAN NOT. why the fuck do you think "haley" or any idiot that does that queer shit is magically protected from detection just because its online? well? well? it doesnt take a postgrad to see through this idiot. i know 1st year students studying gender who could see through this jerk in the blink of an eye. im sorry jr but you do this every time you try to undermine my intelligence. you came off looking like an imbecile because you failed to comprehend a single and simple fucking point about context. if you think omitting punctuation on a FART FETISH FORUM is indicative of someones education you need to grow the fuck up. its funny how you think you can read someones education from their casual writing style but you think someones gender remains a complete mystery until you practically see them in the flesh. if you know anything about the dynamics of onus of proof you will know that that is on him and not i. or sion. it will never happen. and deep down i think you know it. but idfc anymore. im here to enjoy the forum. im no longer arguing about this loser or anything else for that matter.Quote:
Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
if you really are what you say you are (not a complete moron), then your next post will contain some indisputable proof that haley is a man. otherwise you will just prove that you're wrong about yet another thing (not being a complete moron).
i never said that... not once did i say i could read your education from your casual writing style. not once did i say their gender remains a complete mystery until we see them in the flesh. you're pretty good at misquoting people here. now look at it from this angle. you say that she's a man because she's a man. what if i say that you're full of shit about being a postgrad? think about it. what are you going to say, yes i am? then what, i ask you to provide proof? when you do i say that it's fake? come on now; considering where we're at, even a low level philosophy student (since we're talking about different studies and all) could see that with the evidence she's provided the burden of proof now falls on you. see how that works?Quote:
its funny how you think you can read someones education from their casual writing style but you think someones gender remains a complete mystery until you practically see them in the flesh.
now, you say that i keep making myself look like a fool. you've yet to actually throw something that hit me while you've yet to dodge a single shot... really. think about it, who's the fool here? (you, i'm just going to say it now so you can't say the same word with a different target [me] later.)
do you mean the images of two different girls that he tried to pass off as himself?Quote:
Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
...the evidence she's provided...
philosophy...lol. you have no idea do you? your laughable pseudointellectualism is almost as transparent as "haleys" cybertransgenderism. youre wrong. and any philosophy student would have rendered your take on onus of proof dead by now. youre trying to say the onus of proof is on someone saying this guy is fake which is like saying the onus of proof is on the athiest to prove the non existence of god and not on the christian to prove his existence. hes the one who asserts that he is female so burden of proof is on him and it would be as simple as abc if indeed he were female for him to actually prove sion and i wrong. a photo of "her" holding a piece of paper with the url of the forum wouldnt kill "her" anymore than it would kill god to make an appearance. he wont because he cant prove hes female any more than christians can prove the existence of god because he isnt and thats the cold harsh fucking truth. neither can athiests prove the non existence of god but then neither does reason demand we do this. you could fucking use an injection of said reason and then maybe then you would see through this fucking clown. idfc. if you want to allow yourself to be duped thats your prerogative. this conversation is over. if you continue to engage me with discourse and behaviour that would be more at home on a forum for adolescent boys im ignoring you and not bothering to read another word you commit to the forum and that is that.
I already said this several days ago, and I have been ignoring you ever since. What did you say?Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
this conversation is over.
Quite. Feel free at any time to apologise for being obnoxious.Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
if you continue to engage me with discourse and behaviour that would be more at home on a forum for adolescent boys
wow, it's obvious that somebody is full of shit, and it's you. she's shown evidence in the form of multiple pictures. i've already told you that i have pictures a week apart that look more different than hers; you were too busy ignoring any argument other than your own at the moment though. if god provided multiple pictures of himself then you would say he was full of shit. we aren't talking about god proving himself or christians proving god exists because that would require a hell of a lot more evidence than pictures. we're talking about one person proving her sex and all that would take is a few pictures. that is all the evidence she should be expected to give and you saying she needs more is bullshit. now it would be up to you to disprove this by showing evidence contrary to what she's given. you've made it crystal clear that you don't know shit about logic (way to be a postgrad without taking a single intro to logic class... wait, that's NOT POSSIBLE as you need a critical thinking class to even get an AA [correct me if i'm wrong effing, but i can only speak on behalf of the american education system {which, while not as good, isn't as bad in most places as people make it seem}]). you then follow up this terrible logic with "you're all adolescents and i'm not listening, la la la la la." way to go, buddy. you've yet to insult someone without following it up with proof that you are the very thing you had just finished describing.Quote:
Originally posted by windfan
do you mean the images of two different girls that he tried to pass off as himself?Quote:
Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
...the evidence she's provided...
philosophy...lol. you have no idea do you? your laughable pseudointellectualism is almost as transparent as "haleys" cybertransgenderism. youre wrong. and any philosophy student would have rendered your take on onus of proof dead by now. youre trying to say the onus of proof is on someone saying this guy is fake which is like saying the onus of proof is on the athiest to prove the non existence of god and not on the christian to prove his existence. hes the one who asserts that he is female so burden of proof is on him and it would be as simple as abc if indeed he were female for him to actually prove sion and i wrong. a photo of "her" holding a piece of paper with the url of the forum wouldnt kill "her" anymore than it would kill god to make an appearance. he wont because he cant prove hes female any more than christians can prove the existence of god because he isnt and thats the cold harsh fucking truth. neither can athiests prove the non existence of god but then neither does reason demand we do this. you could fucking use an injection of said reason and then maybe then you would see through this fucking clown. idfc. if you want to allow yourself to be duped thats your prerogative. this conversation is over. if you continue to engage me with discourse and behaviour that would be more at home on a forum for adolescent boys im ignoring you and not bothering to read another word you commit to the forum and that is that.