2 years old and it became home grown around 5.5 years old!
Printable View
2 years old and it became home grown around 5.5 years old!
sourmold you should give some details ma man
I highly doubt at 2 years old you even realized you "liked" farts. You probably can't even remember your second birthday. I would ask you about it but you can just make some random bull shit up. At two you are still placing pictures with your memory. Common woman = mom, common man = dad, wet stuff = drink, etc etc. So I find it hard plexed that you had a fart fetish at two years old. If you had said 5 or 6 I would believe you.
Just like the other guy I find that very hard to believe. If you ask a 3 year old what they like they will most likely say some sort of food, a toy, and a TV show. Why is that? Because they have short attention spans and their memory is like a gold fish, one second it's barney then 2 miliseconds later they love power rangers. To say you had a fart fetish at 3 would be the same as any person on this earth saying they had a scat fetish from 1-5 because in that stage you are more prone to play with your own poop because it interest you. Is that a scat fetish? No, it's curiosity but your parents stray you away from it.
It's cool if you don't believe me, and I don't have a problem with that, but I do know what I remember. I really do remember some things from that far back, maybe not in full detail, but in bits and pieces. Once again, I REALLY do remember burying my face in people's (mostly women) butts back then to sniff a fart. I remember my mother trying to break me from this habit up until I was 8 years old, and so then I had to sneak and do it to certain people. Believe it or not, most people only use 2% of their full brain capabilities, and we ALL were born with a natural photographic memory. We just got taught out of how to use it once we got old enough to start school. I'm currently in the process of retraining my brain, unlocking my natural photographic memory, and tapping into the other 98% of my brainpower. The farther along I get in this process, the more I'll be able to remember, and the more stories I can share with everybody on this board.
What the fuck did I just read... You can't be taught to not use part of your brain, that is like saying "I was taught to have my brain not tell my body it inhale so I don't pass out" your brain automatically remembers certain details of certain things because your brain is constantly recording things, similar to a video camera, and cataloging those things with key words, pictures, sounds, ideas, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzrAfzphKyU
Is that what you are trying to do? Holy shit that video is old... As for your search for "The answers within" good luck with tapping into that other 98%. Although let me ask you this, how do you create a memory of something that already happened? And to tie onto that question smelling random womens asses when you were 2-8 seems even more fishy. For one thing a 2 or 3 year old doing it may be seen as strange or cute, but a 6-8 year old? The details/ facts you are providing me are making it harder and harder to believe you. I know I realized I like asses/ farts was when I was 6 and me and my cousin (female) and her brother (also my cousin) were wrestling and she farted in my face, they both said eww but I enjoyed it and from that point on I realized womans farts and asses were something very interesting which grew into what I have today.
I don't think people get it. It's physically impossible to be "aware" at 2-4 years of age. The brain is taking in too much. You haven't learned how to "remember' things on purpose. I mean you're telling me, everyone who has a fetish links it to the only memories in their past? Because I'm sure as hell I can't remember a thing before 5 years old. Maybe a flash of someone's face or something but full awareness wasn't until at least 7 or 8 when I got my second dog. I scarcely remember one at 5 years old but that's that.
You can't say that fetishists only remember their past IF and ONLY IF it pertains to a fetish. It's illogical. It's like saying I only remember my child hood because I liked choking myself or the idea of being eaten (if that were their fetish. Just using an extreme example to show the ridiculousness)
You are by far the second funniest troll I have met on this forum. How do you do it? Is someone co-writing for you? Do you have a list of quick jokes you like to bring up on a note pad? I want to learn your secrets, maybe we can go troll some other forum or ventrilo or whatever people troll now. Maybe youtube?
Either that or you are horribly mistaken, you can not remember your own non-existence because you did not exist. Your brain can not process or fathom a thought of non existence because that would require knowledge of not existing and for you to not exist, as I mentioned before, you would have to exist but not exist at the same time. See what I am getting at? That would create a paradox, but for the matter of third dimensional thought processing we will just call this impossible. As for memories becoming more clear as you age... Does metal age backwards? Does wood become stronger as it gets older? Do bones become more dense as you reach your senior years? The answer to all these questions is no. Memories become fuzzier as you age, why? Because your brain is taking in new memories so the older memories become less important so your brain stores them in the reserve memory, not important enough for immediate retrieval but important enough to stay in the conscious mind.
YES! that's the beauty of it actually, and i ASSURE you i am not trolling i REALLY believe this, i remember it because i don't remember it! it's paradoxical and funny yet true! i remember nothingness, just void darkness. not a single thought ran through my mind because there was no mind to think! no consciousness to be aware of my own existence! the way i remember it is by thinking of my earliest memory, then trying to think of something prior. and what do i get: nothing! haha! it's incredible!
You do realize darkness, or silence in the mind (absence of thought) is not you imagining a prior time before you exist, right? Using that logic you can tell me what dinosaur stepped on the land that is not my house. Unless you are some sentient being from the 10th dimension, I highly doubt you can see into a time before existence.
Just because you believe in it does not make it true, take barney for instance. Real? No, imaginary? Yes. Does that make him real? No, he is a man in a costume, outside of TV he is nothing.
Let me break it down into simple terms so you don't confuse "void" with "impossible".
If you see something, then it exist. If you do not see something it does not exist. (Remember we are referring to your mind) for you to say "I see nothingness" that is not you seeing a time before you exist (impossible by todays thought processing). There were things before you, unless you are telling me you created the universe and the multi-verses that coincide with it, then I have a lot of questions for you. But since you are talking to me I am going to guess you are not either of the two. Things existed before you were born do you see the stock market failing? Or America celebrating it's victory over Japan? How about America's short occupation of Vietnam before we ran for our lives? No? Thats strange because all these things happened before your time so that would mean you have to be able to see them, am I right?
Lol I remember the nothingness. Good one. You can't remember it. What you're remembering is the absence of memory at all. So forget that trick buddy. And one thing I'd point out actually, our brains have never used all of our capacity. The human memory system is... Well you know how the brain looks all wavy like someone took a piece of silly putty and then wove a string through it to leave an impression in it? That's out memory. It goes all around our brain for miles. We can store so much in our Brain, but recalling it is the hard part. You don't actually "recall" it like seeing. A picture. Photographic memory is subjective. You piece it back together which is why your memory gets fuzzy with age: you find it hard to put the right pieces together.
Anyways what I'm saying is that although we have the capacity, the knowledge on how to use it is not sufficient enough to actually do it. So unless you're saying some random guy on a fart fetish board is the newest thing in neurological development, please give up this whole "I remember the non existence' thing.
https://encrypted-tbn3.google.com/im...Q4JPN5BObR6ceO
Gentleman. I propose a truce for now. All of you seem like great scholars. Intelligent nonetheless. So let us end this pointless charade and relish in our great community.
It's lost so why bother? There's no way to win with this outrageous claim.
I was also a fetishist early on. I remember doing what might pass for masturbation in my crib, though it was unrelated to this particular fetish.
You're a scientologist, aren't you? No, I'm not trolling or being silly. These principles have been brought up almost verbatim in scientology. While some of the things you say sound like hogwash, I AM a firm believer that we can unlock greater potential in our minds, and that through the correct processes, meditative states and hypnosis, we can potentially remember back to our birth.
I know a genius of sorts who claims to have done so. Said he saw the web of creation, and potentiality, the flowing stuff of the universe. His earliest memory was hearing a cicada as an infant, or possibly that the blur of random sounds of reality came through like a cicada.
https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/im...jFp9lHEdsKdLwA
I proposed a truce! Do I need to enforce it?
one's earliest flashes of memories: 2 or so (i can personally remember something just before i was 2 but there's very little context there). earliest awareness: about 4 (i know quite a few decisions i made around then). i for one knew i had this fetish at 4.
The human brain is capable of incredible things, from creating things that do not exist in reality to being able to understand multiple languages with ease. While the language part may seem trivial is actually a pretty rare talent. But if you take a look at todays society I have very bleak hope for large quantities of people remembering what they ate for dinner the other night let alone what happened when they were 2 months old. But it is called development for a reason, as they say "Rome was not built in a day!"
i think we should go back to tellin experiences hahaha but thats just me
peace brothas
get any women to fart on you as a kid?
The only woman I heard farting in my life so far is my mom and that just goes to show how unlucky I am. :(
No, why would my mom fart on me???? :O
Quote:
Originaly posted by Mudofale: Either that or you are horribly mistaken, you can not remember your own non-existence because you did not exist. Your brain can not process or fathom a thought of non existence because that would require knowledge of not existing and for you to not exist, as I mentioned before, you would have to exist but not exist at the same time. See what I am getting at? That would create a paradox, but for the matter of third dimensional thought processing we will just call this impossible. As for memories becoming more clear as you age... Does metal age backwards? Does wood become stronger as it gets older? Do bones become more dense as you reach your senior years? The answer to all these questions is no. Memories become fuzzier as you age, why? Because your brain is taking in new memories so the older memories become less important so your brain stores them in the reserve memory, not important enough for immediate retrieval but important enough to stay in the conscious mind.]
Yeah! this would be a paradox (itself) depending on the way of knowing you do consider when you affrim something. When it turns into a paradox is when you do consider the point of having experience. I explain myself, you have to exist (to know) and no-exist (to experience the non-existence) at the same time. Yeah, this is logically a paradox but only if you do consider the necessity of existence. LOL.
In this world, as it has been proved with quantum physics, the experience of something leads to a paradox when understanding what happens. I would say this in order to defend another way of considering the veracity of affirming something.
Many people tend to believe or understand (both are quite similar in the end LOL atleast in quantum electrodynamics by Feynman) in things which are not directly proven (i mean in their faces). This is clearly the case of quantum physiscs. I mean, mathemathicly, many models has shown as that the possibility of being in two states at the same time could easily be possible (quite redundant).
That is one of the solution of Scröedinger's wave equation.
What I'm trying to say is you probably would believe in what quantum physics say without having your own experience of the reality it is talking about. And if you do agree with what I am saying that would contradictory taking into account what you said to theguyfromny was agains what you really think (that the knowledge can come from other ways rather than experience, which is the point of my post) LOL
Rather old post... but I am confused as to what you are getting at. In fact, I have no idea what this thread was even about.