Culture and fetishes

[SionDS]

Just something I was thinking about. It seems like different fetishes are more attractive to different cultures.

Every now and then when I trade home made pics, Ill trade with Indian(as in India) husbands/boyfriends, and they seem to like, or at lest be more open to their wives/girlfriends pooping and farting. I chatted at length with one guy who said there was an indian saying about love that basically translates to "If your truly love a woman, you will love everything about her." I think it has something to do with these fetishes. It's just too bad we don't see any Indian fart fetish movies, but then again, there is hardly any Indian porn anyway. Waaaaay too much of a cultural taboo. They don't even kiss in their movies, so porn is a big deal over there. No wonder most of the Indian women who are in porn are either living in the UK or America.

I've noticed that there seems to be a lot of scat/poop vids made in Germany.

For real home made swinging video's, a lot seem to be made in Germany, Russia, Ukraine, and France.

For fart fetish, for Americans anyway, a lot of those who are into it are black. I have a friend who has a foot fetish. He's crazy about it, saves tons of pics, give free foot massages to women, goes to foot fetish forums ect, and the large majority of other guys into that are white Americans and not much else.

Before anyone says anything. I guess this is stereotyping, but I don't mean anything in a disrespectful way, so chill out and be cool. ::beach

[Guzara]

yes you are correct.

[Duane W.]

What is here is hormones and biochemicals. not much else. as far as classifying people, we are all guilty, especially here in the usa. but you acknowledged that classifying people is natural, but unfortunately not accurate. Men will say alot of shit when they have hormones banging at their brains with sledgehammers. Its not their fault if they are not accurate. Thinking that one nationalization of horny is different from a different nationalization of horny is like saying black people are supposed to play basketball and white people like Sauerkraut. Statistics aren't always accurate with truth. But what can we possibly know other than what we have experienced? Its an odd paradox.

Methinks you are mixing up love with lust. please be more careful in the future not to mix the two. Lust is based on physical biochemistry. It is not with love. If a person has love, and looks for the lust inside of it thats cool. If a person has lust and looks for the love inside of it, they are bound for disappointment.

Love is based on the spirit. not only does lust supplement love, so does everything else in eternity. Of course you'll find lust when you have love, but more than likely NOT vice versa. There is semen to eject, not shoulders to lean on.

I am under the impression you were listening to the devil on your shoulder when you posted this topic. Lust is physiological element.

there is no love here. this place is a lust repository. Fetishes are deviant desires. Everybody here is a bunch of mutants. I don't mean to insult you but I do mean to warn you. Think about saving the world or curing disease or spreading joy. Contemplating fetishes is understandable, but keep it brief.

these are only suggestions, not definitions. no need to state the obvious when I say you may spend your time doing whatever you want to do. This entire message could be completely incorrect. I believe it is correct. Someone is laughing at you for giving fetishism serious contemplation at all. It's a novelty item, like a star trek costume for a star trek fanatic. NOT a diamond ring. One statistic that I came up with just recently is that we have fucked up values these days and it effects the quality of our experiences in a bad way if we don't get it right.
got it?

[SionDS]

Originally posted by Duane W.
What is here is hormones and biochemicals. not much else. as far as classifying people, we are all guilty, especially here in the usa. but you acknowledged that classifying people is natural, but unfortunately not accurate. Men will say alot of shit when they have hormones banging at their brains with sledgehammers. Its not their fault if they are not accurate. Thinking that one nationalization of horny is different from a different nationalization of horny is like saying black people are supposed to play basketball and white people like Sauerkraut. Statistics aren't always accurate with truth. But what can we possibly know other than what we have experienced? Its an odd paradox.

Do you know what a generalization is?

Most NBA players are black. Most sauerkraut lovers are white. Those are accurate generalizations.


One statistic that I came up with just recently is that we have fucked up values these days and it effects the quality of our experiences in a bad way if we don't get it right.
got it?

Do you know what a statistic is?

[1313Jr.1313]

statistically speaking, this shit is whack, yo.

seriously though, 4 out of 5 doctors agree that 4 out of 5 doctors agree with the other 3 doctors because the fifth is a douche while the other doctor disagrees as he doesn't think he's a douche (but 4 out of 5 douches don't think they are douches).

[Duane W.]

Ok. you took offense. all apologies. I was just trying to let you know this is where the mind wanders the gutter. Do you really want to give serious contemplation here? I have studied fetishes, but I just found that it was not worth its time.

Many people get laughed at/ridiculed for many actions and conditions. Please don't feel like that was an insult, I've had more than my fair share of attempted putdowns. but the wonderful thing we have called free will just keeps me stronger the more I disreguard bullshit other people try to feed me. Apply 13's message, Take nothing here "seriously". Exercise free will, but don't shut out suggestions. Love and Lust are not good to be confused. You will find hot mutant lust here, if thats your bag, baby. ::funny

I know what a generalization is. Its reasonable, but just not exactly accurate. Thats the difference between a probability and a definition.

I know what a statistic is. Maybe I could rephrase my statement. :One statistic that I came up with just recently is that the MAJORITY of us have fucked up values these days and it effects the quality of our experiences in a bad way if we don't get it right.

as far as generalizations and statistics, they are not to be relied upon. For instance :
decade - 1980s : black people are gang members while white people are country club members. Women are in the kitchen, not in the office.
generally, statistically speaking this may have been true. Yet this was all due to suppressed/oppressed potentiality.
decade 2010 : women are in the white house offices, black people share the country club with whites, and there are plenty of thugged out caucasoid gangsters doing dirt right next to the negroids. Thats growth for ya

Check the quality of most urban schools, and urban family values and you'll see why there are so many black athletes as opposed to black astrophysicists. but its getting better.

Cultures are getting refined from incorrect into the correct status. Sometimes paying attention to whats going on around you is diving into an inaccuracy because there might just be some messed up conditions handed down to an entire generation. GOOGLE:"everything is terrible"
Within a decade, or a century, what was once thought to be, is found to be completely false. I am 100% sure that a fetish is not accurate behavior to be relied upon for study data. Its a mutation in the petri dish. Something to be thrown out. One day we may all like sauerkraut equally, statistically, but I'm sure that farts are just plain gross, and they will probably remain that way whether we prefer it to be or not.

[SionDS]

I'm not offended, it's just that your posts are pretty strange, and most of it has no relevance to what the topic is about. Confusing love with lust? Talking about spirits and devils? What does any of that have to do with what I posted? What was that in response to?


I know what a generalization is. Its reasonable, but just not exactly accurate. Thats the difference between a probability and a definition.

Ok, so we agree

Dont get hung up generalizations. By definition they are not accurate, thats why they are....generalizations! No one takes them as 100%. That's the whole point. I'll give you some examples: "Most Americans speak english." "Most black people have dark skin." These generalizations are still true and accurate, even though a small minority of Americans dont speak english, and some black people are albino and have whiter skin than I do. It doesn't change the accuracy.

Again, no one is saying they are 100% truth, so why argue it? We have no conflict here.


Do you really want to give serious contemplation here? I have studied fetishes, but I just found that it was not worth its time.

Maybe I dont understand you, but why are you on a fart fetish forum if you dont think fetishes should be thought about? I find this stuff interesting, thats why I think about it. I also think about a lot of other things too, but I dont usually bring them up here, because this forum is about 1 thing only, and that's what I discuss here.

[takesages]

Don't have much to add to this discussion, other than I agree with SionDS in that Duane W has sorely missed the point of this thread.
The original post was not about racial (genetic) stereotypes in any way, but cultural. Nurture vs nature.
It's a fact that there are a lot more scat vids/sites from Germany than India, that's not any kind of assumption or generalisation, and I too am interested in the differences in societies (upbringing/customs/norms and values) that cause these situations. I hope this discussion can continue in an orderly fashion, as I would like to hear other people's views and experiences on this subject.

[1313Jr.1313]

to those who wish to argue semantics, just take into account the exception rule: "All rules have at least one exception."

[Connect]

Originally posted by 1313Jr.1313
to those who wish to argue semantics, just take into account the exception rule: "All rules have at least one exception."

That would mean the exception rule would also have an exception wouldn't it? Meaning that there are rules that have no exceptions. :D

And as easy as that I argued semantics. :)

Anyway, on topic. In my experience fetishism seems to be connected to frustration. Cultures with conservative lifestyles, like Germany and Japan, seem to breed a lot of sexual frustration which apparently tends to manifest into deviancy. That is why these countries have such a famous underground fetish community, to serve as escapism and release. But then again more sexually liberal cultures like France and Sweden are also known for their deviancy, which can instead be attributed to a willingness to experiment. So I guess it's not that easy after all.

I know that my fetishes manifested as a result of sexual frustration and suppression of my sex life.

[1313Jr.1313]

yes, even the exception rule has one exception: the exception rule... which PROVES that the exception rule is true.